Είναι σχήμα οξύμορο για οιονδήποτε χρήστη, να θέλει το αυτ/το του να καίει 5 λτ/100 χλμ., να μη ρυπαίνει, να αποδίδει 200 ίππους και 240 nm από το ρελαντί, νομίζοντας ότι όλα αυτά επιτεύχθηκαν με κάποια μαγική συνταγή και δεν απαιτείται να αλλάξει τις άσχημες πρακτικές χρήσης που έμαθε από τον Πατέρα του π.χ. η προθέρμανση κινητήρα στο ρελαντί σε χαμηλές θερμοκρασίες περιβάλλοντος.
Δεν υπάρχουν μαγικές συνταγές στη Μηχανική !
Υπενθυμίζω ότι η τραγωδία του διαστημικού λεωφορείου challenger το 1986, έγινε από λεπτούς δακτύλιους στεγανοποίησης δεξαμενών καυσίμων και η εκτόξευσή του έγινε σε ακραίο ψύχος Γενάρη μήνα.
Πρέπει να προσαρμοστούμε στην νέα πραγματικότητα και αυτό δεν είναι κάτι δύσκολο.
Ότι πρέπει να κάνουμε έχει γραφτεί και ξαναγραφτεί εδώ μέσα ξανά και ξανά.
Δεν είναι τίποτα ακατόρθωτο ή δυσνόητο.
Μιάς και αρέσκεστε να διαβάζετε τα Αμερικάνικα φόρουμ, παραθέτω παρακάτω ένα κείμενο από κάποιον που μάλλον ξέρει τι του γίνεται, ελπίζοντας ότι με αυτό θα κλείσει το θέμα :
It's a Honda. I see so much panic in this forum about direct injection carbon, CVT reliability speculation, the fact that turbochargers are historically unreliable, and oil dilution. I think people sometimes underestimate Honda and just want to find things to worry about, either so they can find some way to prevent the perceived issue, or just because they're naturally worriers, or maybe they're pessimistic or dramatic.
For example, 1.) The DI thing has been expelled many times already; there's never been any known issues with carbon buildup in direct injected Honda engines, because they've taken various steps to alleviate that issue in the engineering of the motors, such as recommending the use of Top Tier fuels with detergents that are known to help prevent carbon buildup, and by spraying a tiny amount of fuel on the valves to 'wash' any deposits off before they can bond. 2.) As far as CVTs go, many manufacturers have had issues with CVT reliability, Honda has not, even under extreme conditions and people TRYING to kill them. 'Nuff said. 3.) Turbos have been notoriously unreliable since their inception many, many decades ago. Lots of car manufacturers lately have been slapping turbos on their 4-bangers to make them perform more like a V6, and many (such as Chevy) have had major known issues with the turbos seizing up. Honda has never had any such issues.
Honda has spent their entire lifetime as a company working to build up their reputation as one of the most reliable brands on the road, and they achieved that through extreme R&D that most other manufacturers don't bother doing. They didn't do it by overlooking known issues with CVTs and turbos, just slapping them on all willy-nilly, or overlooking known issues with direct injection and just doing it for the sake of doing it. They achieved their reputation and are able to keep it because they don't put out a product until they've engineered and tested it ad nauseam and are 100% sure that it meets their standards and the expectations of their consumer base. They aren't going to allow a product to be released that jeopardizes the reputation that the company was built on, or fails to meet the quality their customers expect.
In short, it's a Honda, and it will last until you decide you're ready to upgrade to another Honda That's their business model, and that's why most of us drive Hondas. Stop worrying, maintain your car properly, and trust that Honda has never led anyone astray and they aren't about to now.
Αν δεν σε ενδιαφέρει η οδηγική συγκίνηση, πάρε το 2008, αν και μια επίσκεψη για το HRV δεν θα ήταν κακή ιδέα!;)